California to Require Virtual Asset Licenses, Increasing Pressure on Companies

▲ Cryptocurrency regulation / ChatGPT-generated image

California has reached a major turning point as it moves forward in earnest with the enforcement of a new state-level virtual asset licensing regime, reshaping the market’s identity while increasing regulatory pressure on local companies.

According to crypto-focused media outlet Decrypt on February 19 (local time), the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) announced official implementation guidelines for the Digital Financial Assets Law (DFAL), mandating that all virtual asset-related businesses serving residents in the state obtain a license. Under the law signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in October 2023, all applicable companies must either hold a license or complete their application by July 1, 2026. Those unable to demonstrate that they qualify for an exemption will face strong legal action.

The new framework is structurally similar to New York State’s BitLicense introduced in 2015, raising concerns within the industry about a potential exodus of companies amid tighter regulations. Joe Ciccolo, executive director of the California Blockchain Advocacy Coalition, stated, “As the world’s fourth-largest economy, California’s regulatory choices will have a significant impact nationwide.” He added that while clear rules could attract institutional capital, smaller firms lacking sufficient resources may choose to leave the California market.

The license application process will begin on March 9, 2026, through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System (NMLS), and regulators plan to hold an industry education session on March 23 to facilitate a smooth transition. With approximately one-quarter of all U.S. blockchain companies concentrated in California, the success of this regulatory rollout is expected to be a key variable shaping the future of the American virtual asset ecosystem. If enforcement proves overly aggressive or misaligned with operational realities, there remains a risk that virtual asset activities could shift offshore or into underground markets.

As major virtual assets, including Bitcoin (BTC), experience mixed trends amid a new regime of volatility and technical controversies, California’s move is also being viewed positively in terms of providing regulatory clarity. Even as the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump pursues crypto-friendly policies, the establishment of a detailed supervisory system at the state level is expected to further strengthen investor protection and market integrity. Ecosystems such as the XRP Ledger will also face the challenge of pursuing technological advancement within this legal framework.

Ultimately, the enforcement of California’s Digital Financial Assets Law can be seen as an inevitable growing pain as virtual assets become integrated into the mainstream financial system. Striking an appropriate balance between consumer protection and market vitality will be the central challenge for regulators going forward, and only companies that complete the licensing process are likely to maintain their foothold in California’s massive market. The global virtual asset industry is closely watching whether California’s new regulatory environment will become a barrier to innovation or a foundation for growth.

Disclaimer: This article is for investment reference only, and we are not responsible for any investment losses incurred based on it. The content should be interpreted for informational purposes only.